|
![]() |
|
President's Message
Welcome to New Members and greetings to all. How do you think of the Internet? What is its relationship with television? How are they used together now – and how might they be? What values will inform the new media landscape?
“How was the event? I so wanted to attend but was feeling sick and overwhelmed with work,” said a student of mine at Columbia Journalism School the next day. She wants to use the Internet to report her documentary – to tap into the collective wisdom of the crowd and the community of interest around her topic.
Their open source software may be downloaded at www.getmiro.com. Anne cited three example of its use in community video websites: http://vermontcam.org/; http://www.mediasanctuary.org/; http://cctvcambridge.org/; and http://medfield.tv/. Participatory Culture’s efforts to democratize video hosting are elaborated at www.mirocommunity.org. One senses that PCF and Miro’s work is just beginning. Their website states:
Since 2003, Nan Rubin has been Project Director
of Preserving Digital Public Television, funded by the Library of Congress’s
National Digital Information and Infrastructure It was hard enough to preserve analog video – think of all the format changes that have occurred since the founding of public television. As anyone knows who has experienced the change from shooting videotape to recording video on P2 cards, you have to plan your workflow – and your archiving. Her advice: plan for preservation from the start of any production – not as an afterthought. Searching www.ptvdigitalarchive.org, I found her May 2009 paper entitled “Is There Life After Broadcasting?” She writes, “In a culture that expects broadcast media to be available whenever it chooses, the notion of a video archive takes on new meaning: not as a gatekeeper to accessing older content, but rather as a guardian protecting that content and keeping it vital. Unlike videotape, it isn’t enough to close a digital file and put it on a virtual shelf.” Read the full paper at http://www.thirteen.org/ptvdigitalarchive/files/2009/10/internat-preservation-news-spring-2009.pdf Nan spoke about the need for producers to provide metadata – words to accompany video images – so that programs may be easily searchable. She mentioned one growing standard for doing it, pbcore: http://www.pbcore.org/ Nan said that innovative opportunities abound at the intersection of the Internet and television but that existing public media and public access media need to explore them creatively.
Zenaida is working nationally on media policy to protect Public Access through the Alliance for Community Media http://www.alliancecm.org/. Mentioning the Comcast purchase of NBC/Universal and the company’s record in Philadelphia of fighting public access, she said that channels for Public, Educational and Government use are being threatened nationally as cable companies compete with telephone companies over broadband. She noted that the ACM website not only features innovative ideas from public access centers but also a campaign to urge Congress to support the Community Access Preservation Act HR 3745.
What do you think? Explore the websites listed above and watch MNN’s videotape of the discussion, and come up with your suggestions for future NYFVC programs to examine our changing media landscape. Thank you to NYFVC Board Members David Callahan and Andrea Traubner who organized the reception, and Donna Cameron who became a studio camera operator when one was needed at the last moment, and Alexa Coyle who provided much needed support as our administrative assistant. To all, Happy New Year 2010
|
|
|||
Site Design by TeknoWizards, L.L.C. |
||||